An attempt by Cllr. Brigid Manton and Cllr. Darragh Butler to rezone the Brackenstown (Rivervalley, Ridgewood, Ashfield and Knocksedan) and Uniplumo (Rathbeale Road) Greenbelts respectively was firmly opposed by a majority of Cllrs who spoke against each motion.
The Fingal Executive also urged rejection of Cllr. Manton’s and Cllr. Butler’s motions aimed at rezoning our precious Greenbelts. In addition, they confirmed there is a surplus of residential-zoned land in Fingal.
These rezoning attempts by both Cllrs. faced mass opposition from our community. It is a lesson that when we organise as a community we can bring in real change.
Our aim from the outset was to create a clean, safe and sustainable community for this generation (especially for our children) and the generation to come.
Many of the Cllrs. who spoke praised our campaign and said it was a great example of people power and local democracy in action.
Thank you to everyone who supported the campaign.
Special mention to the 5 Swords Cllrs. who actively supported Save Swords Greenbelt from the start.
They listened to the wishes of our community and championed the communities cause. They are; Cllr. Joe Newman (Indpt), Cllr. Ann Graves (Sinn Fein), Cllr. Ian Carey (Green Party), Cllr. James Humphreys (Labour Party) and Cllr. Dean Mulligan (Indpts4Change).
The campaign will remain active and continue to grow. We urge all of the community to get involved in the campaign and protect our precious Greenbelts.
It’s expected Motion 535 will be voted on tomorrow, Tuesday 11th.
If passed, we lose the Greenbelt forever.
We’re planning to meet outside Fingal County Council, Main Street, Swords, Tuesday 11th at 2 pm. We will have the campaign banner and will be handing out leaflets to the 40 Cllrs. urging them to oppose Motion 535.
Please make a special effort to join us, and ask your friends and family to invest just 1 hour in saving the Greenbelt. Once it’s gone, it’s gone forever and our community will be left counting the cost. Not just this generation, but generations to come.
All of us, especially our children deserve to grow up in a healthy, safe and sustainable community. Fingal CEO AnnMarie Farrelly has already confirmed there is enough land already zoned residential to cope with anticipated demand. Destroying a vital Greenbelt as the climate change crisis gets worse makes no sense.
If you can make it, please confirm by sending us an email or if you have any questions contact us;
It’s expected Motion 535 will be voted on next Tuesday 11th.
If passed, we lose the Greenbelt forever.
We’re planning to meet outside Fingal County Council, Main Street, Swords next Tuesday 11th at 2 pm. We will have the campaign banner and will be handing out leaflets to the 40 Cllrs. urging them to oppose Motion 535.
Please make a special effort to join us, and ask your friends and family to invest just 1 hour in saving the Greenbelt. Once it’s gone, it’s gone forever and our community will be left counting the cost. Not just this generation, but generations to come.
All of us, especially our children deserve to grow up in a healthy, safe and sustainable community. Fingal CEO AnnMarie Farrelly has already confirmed there is enough land already zoned residential to cope with anticipated demand. Destroying a vital Greenbelt as the climate change crisis gets worse makes no sense.
If you can make it, please confirm by sending us an email or if you have any questions contact us;
Again a big thank you to everyone who has signed and shared the petition. We’ve surpassed the 2,500 mark!
We’ve canvassed all of the communities affected by Motion 535. This includes; Rivervalley, Ridgewood, Ashfield and Knocksedan. The vast majority of residents support the Greenbelt’s protection.
Most recently we spoke with residents in Knocksedan. Of the 250 residents we met, 223 signed the petition (…or 89%) opposing Motion: 535 and supported the retention and protection of the Greenbelt.
95% of the residents we spoke to in Knocksedan were unaware that Motion: 535 had been put forward. Clearly, there had been no prior consultation with them beforehand.
This pattern is repeated in the other estates mentioned above, with even higher support for the Greenbelt (93%+).
It’s obvious there is mass opposition to Motion 535 tabled by Cllr. Manton under the Fingal Development Plan. There is no mandate for this motion and it should be withdrawn immediately.
Cllrs. are due to vote on Motion 535 in the next few days, so please act now before it’s too late.
Community frustration is turning to anger, in response to Cllr. Manton’s latest email reply to residents.
Residents who had contacted the campaign have said Cllr. Manton’s reply was “condescending”, “patronising” and “dismissive”.
In addition, the Cllr’s email contains a number of inaccuracies which we’ve responded to below (Cllr’s initial email is in bold).
Just to put things in perspective here. I am in favour of the green necklace around Swords. The area in question however is not a greenbelt. It is actually privately owned land that is not for sale. Greenbelt does not equate to green space.
The Greenbelt, which the Cllr is trying to rezone is a key part of the green necklace. You can’t rezone the Greenbelt & support the green necklace at the same time. It’s contradictory!
The land in question is a Greenbelt. This is confirmed in the Fingal Development Plan/Maps Draft Sheet 8 – Swords;
The following is the definition of a greenbelt: Greenbelt” is a general term that refers to natural, undeveloped, and/or agricultural lands that surround urban areas. These lands may include open spaces, parks, farms and ranches, wildlands, or a combination thereof—as designated by cities, counties, special districts, and other jurisdictions.
There is a greenbelt area across the road from Knocksedan. On that greenbelt, there is everything from packaging companies to large lorries to helicopters to bouncy castles.
This is incorrect. You cannot build on a Greenbelt. The general rule of thumb with Greenbelt land is that any and all building developments are prohibited unless they are covered by exceptions in government policy. The main exceptions are for agricultural and forestry buildings, some outdoor sports facilities and extensions or replacements of existing buildings.
Greenbelt allows for a whole load of ad hoc matter including caravans. During the last two years, we have had hundreds of caravans move onto two different sites in Holywell and it was a huge ordeal to have them removed and back to where they came from.
The Cllr. shouldn’t use the Traveller community as a scaremongering tactic to frighten our community.
The man who owns this land has donated huge amounts of land to the community and is prepared to give more along with playing fields to the community. I put this motion forward because I believe that it’s worthwhile having the conversation to get the best we can for our community.
The land doesn’t have to be rezoned in order for the landowner to donate land to the community or to discuss transferring a portion of the land to the Council as a public amenity.
The Cllr’s motion calls for a “conversation”. We’ve already had a conversation through the official channel, the Fingal Draft Development Plan Public Consultation process, where 99.4% (329 v 2 submissions) of Swords residents called for the Greenbelt retained and protected. This is the official and democratic process, followed by residents. We ask the Cllr. again, to acknowledge and honour this decision by the community.
I suggest you go on google and look at what is zoned greenbelt across the road from Knocksedan and then tell me that that is what we want to leave ourselves open to.
See the note above re the definition of “greenbelt”.
On a personal note, I love Swords. I played in this area as a child and have many memories of being terrified of being caught by the farmers who owned it. It is an absolute joy for me to see this area come into public ownership. However, we cannot achieve anymore without working with the people who actually own what we are looking for.
We love Swords also. The best way for the Cllr. to demonstrate this is to respect our community’s wishes and protect our precious Greenbelt, for now, and for the generation to come.
2000+ residents have already signed an ongoing petition supporting this request.
I hope this may give you some further insight as to why this motion was submitted.
Unfortunately, Cllr. Manton’s reply doesn’t reflect the best interests of our community. Again, we ask the Cllr. to withdraw Motion 535.
Rezoning a Greenbelt creates a dangerous precedent, by putting all Greenbelt at risk of future rezoning.
Rezoning should take place based on strategic need & suitable location and not driven by random offers of land “donations”. If this model was adopted it would signal a return to the “bad old days”, a chaotic and failed policy of ad hoc planning versus sustainable community building advocated by the vast majority of residents, 5 of the 7 Swords Cllrs., Fingal County Council Planners and it’s CEO AnnMarie Farrelly.
We want our children to grow up in a clean, safe and sustainable environment. Motion 535 would lead to urban sprawl, worsening climate change and more pressure on already overstretched services.
Please listen to our community Cllr. and withdraw Motion 535!
